Failure to meet deadlines for completing tasks may be a consequence of the fact that the manager interacts little with subordinates, does not provide them with advice or tips. For example, how best to plan time, what to do and in what order. He is not interested in such trifles as whether employees have the necessary knowledge, experience, materials and tools to promptly complete the assigned task.
If there are too many "sat-ins" and "saboteurs" in the department, determine whether the manager has earned authority among the employees.
It is considered normal how does cash app work that about 19% of employees are actively involved in the work process, about 55% of employees simply work for their money, and almost 16% openly criticize everything that is happening. If, during a loyalty study conducted in a company, it is established that in some departments the total number of dissatisfied people exceeds the specified norm, then there is reason to think. This means that the manager does not have the necessary authority, he cannot competently motivate subordinates.
Those who work for results should be asked why they are satisfied with everything and why they work well, and those who are dissatisfied should be asked the reasons for their irritation. If the answer is that the management demands too much and is too strict, and the pay is small, while the involved employees are working hard because of their personal loyalty to the director, then you need to pay attention to those who are ready to work for material reward. Also, to determine whether the boss is an informal leader in his team, it is necessary to organize a mini-survey of employees.
Methods for assessing the performance of a manager
There are several methods for assessing the effectiveness of a manager's activities. The most common methods are listed below.