An Alternative to the Hierarchy of Human Needs
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 3:54 am
In the West, the "Theory of Personnel Motivation" by L. Ron Hubbard is also widespread. His pyramid is designed to simplify management tasks and consists of eight "dynamics of survival." The concept is not related to science, but is very popular. Hubbard believes that the majority of people are chasing money.
This concept works only if there are unsatisfied desires that can be realized with the help of money (power). The theory considers only superficial needs, and the most interesting (natural needs) remains behind the scenes. The limitations of the concept mean that it can only be used to motivate personnel, increase labor productivity.
An Alternative to the Hierarchy of Human Needs
Such theories, which are vk database dominated by one basic idea, are easy to learn and promise to quickly bring practical benefits, which is why they are so popular. The main idea: the masses need money, creative individuals need recognition, and save the fans of your business for a rainy day.
Another option that will be useful for managers or HR specialists when hiring: attract lazy people with conditions, inspire activists with an example, and challenge the self-sufficient.
Maslow's theory can be used with benefit not very often, for example, when studying the same narrow ideas. For example, his concept of hierarchies closely echoes the hypothesis of Lev Gumilev (Passionary Theory of Ethnogenesis). In this theory, our scientist considers how, with the progress of civilization, cultural needs also develop. But it would be a mistake to mention Maslow's system when studying the needs of modern humanity or personal aspirations. It is necessary to choose methods that are not the simplest or most common, but those that are suitable for a specific question.
If you want to study your needs, you should not rely on the first theories that catch your eye. The most popular of them are usually too simple, have many gaps. Their formulations and definitions are far from the original source, numerous retellings do not benefit such theories, but contribute to their wide dissemination due to the vulgar presentation of information.
The simpler the concept, the easier it is to apply in practice. That is why simplified theories are so popular. But, on the other hand, such simplicity is not able to show the full diversity of natural possibilities. When reviewing other people's work, do not be too naive, show healthy skepticism. Such primitive concepts are of little use. Unfortunately, more complete models are not popular enough and are distributed only in a narrow circle of researchers.
This concept works only if there are unsatisfied desires that can be realized with the help of money (power). The theory considers only superficial needs, and the most interesting (natural needs) remains behind the scenes. The limitations of the concept mean that it can only be used to motivate personnel, increase labor productivity.
An Alternative to the Hierarchy of Human Needs
Such theories, which are vk database dominated by one basic idea, are easy to learn and promise to quickly bring practical benefits, which is why they are so popular. The main idea: the masses need money, creative individuals need recognition, and save the fans of your business for a rainy day.
Another option that will be useful for managers or HR specialists when hiring: attract lazy people with conditions, inspire activists with an example, and challenge the self-sufficient.
Maslow's theory can be used with benefit not very often, for example, when studying the same narrow ideas. For example, his concept of hierarchies closely echoes the hypothesis of Lev Gumilev (Passionary Theory of Ethnogenesis). In this theory, our scientist considers how, with the progress of civilization, cultural needs also develop. But it would be a mistake to mention Maslow's system when studying the needs of modern humanity or personal aspirations. It is necessary to choose methods that are not the simplest or most common, but those that are suitable for a specific question.
If you want to study your needs, you should not rely on the first theories that catch your eye. The most popular of them are usually too simple, have many gaps. Their formulations and definitions are far from the original source, numerous retellings do not benefit such theories, but contribute to their wide dissemination due to the vulgar presentation of information.
The simpler the concept, the easier it is to apply in practice. That is why simplified theories are so popular. But, on the other hand, such simplicity is not able to show the full diversity of natural possibilities. When reviewing other people's work, do not be too naive, show healthy skepticism. Such primitive concepts are of little use. Unfortunately, more complete models are not popular enough and are distributed only in a narrow circle of researchers.